Coaching

Coaching can be defined as the activity in which someone a “an adviser, counselor, leader, etc., leads to each other for advancement to a desired state. In sports, coaches or coaches have this vital work. The difference in the performance of players depending on who his coach is not only explains the tactics that he used, the type of training that makes or physical form in which they are, but largely by the work of coaching , in which the coach acts as a transformative leader, getting the best out of players, even they themselves did not know limits. I have commented on more than one occasion Guardiola example, as an example of a leader who has managed to guide his staff, to establish fruitful dialogue with them, exercise guide, plan with them the goals and achieve them, today could get his third title, the Champions League, but in any event, the season done is fantastic, have managed to endure tension in all three competitions, achieving your goals step by step. The coaching is to help the other person (coachee) to make the best of oneself, to work to perceive things differently and is unable, by itself, to interpret the situation properly and achieve its goals. In this sense, Guardiola has taught to play football for its players, or have managed to give the best of themselves? Be related, therefore, on the theory of the four I’s of Baas, that this transformative leader must influence, inspirational motivation generated, achieving intellectual stimulation and individualized attention. Just as Socrates did, not about providing answers but asking the right questions so that the coachee reach their own solutions. Today, however, the coaching has advanced greatly, and although the Greek philosopher might be a precursor, it is now also used techniques from other branches, such as psychology or management business.

The coach helps the coachee to remove it may be, and often limit their potential as self-fulfilling prophecy. I remember these effects have ever read about the debate of whether Armstrong had walked on the moon really was a show or anything because it was argued that the technology of the time was a fair bit to achieve that feat. Without entering the debate of whether it is true or not, the response from supporters of OESI a is that, apart from the competition posed by reasoning with the Soviet Union, success was achieved because they set that goal and believe in he broke his prejudices If your goal was to reach higher, or spend more time in space, so would get, but managed to reach the moon, although it seems a truism, because that was what was proposed, exceeding therefore their mental barriers. Pablo Rodriguez is a graduate in Business Administration, Auditing postgraduate in MBA and Master, passionate world of economics and business management.

Comments are closed.