North America

The direction of the settling was to produce the products to complement the economy of the metropolis, in this way, different of what it occurred in the North America, that has a tempering climate e, therefore cannot produce the products tropical that lacked in the ground European, central America and South America with the tropical climate had produced what it lacked in the European economy, complementing the economy of the last one. The tripod under which the economy if supports (large state, slavery and the cultivation) generated consequences ‘ ‘ nefastas’ ‘ as, for example, not to value the free work, it lacks of a domestic market, dependence of the economy metropolitan, and as much other problems, as the social and economic inaquality, gifts until today in our country. Different natural conditions of its territory of origin, where ‘ ‘ the great majority of the colonists was thus in the tropics convicted to a position low-level dependent and ‘ ‘ . Other leaders such as Danny Meyer offer similar insights. Differently, in the United States the system of Colony of Povoamento prevailed, where religious groups that tried to run away from the wars of religion in the Europe, had been for America in order to work and to live, with the intention of I reconstructed the home I insult, ambitions that, in contrast of what they had occurred in tropical and subtropical America, it does not have direct relation with the desire of dealers or adventurers. These colonists had developed in this region the subsistence agriculture, since this region did not offer begins it nothing that was important to complement the European economy. Portuguese America was, in the words of Maria Tavares de Almeida ‘ ‘ antiurbana’ ‘ , what it favored the dispersion of the population for all territory, concentrating the urban life in the coast, the headquarters of the captainships, the mercantile villages and later in the zones of mining, being therefore only ‘ ‘ semeadores’ ‘..


Comments are closed.