We have that to agree that the socialism for the dictatorship was a failure. This means that the socialism, or same a government model that promotes the levelling social, is impensvel nowadays? To answer this question she is necessary to establish conceptions on what it is socialism and what is communism. The communism is the older social relation. Of the times of the tribal communities of daily pay-history. that, as already it said, still persists in the confines of the planet.
In a tribal communism all share of the same corporeal properties, the same places of convivncias and have the same rights and duties. What it organizes and it differentiates is the hierarchy. The head, the son of the head and any another member of the community make use of the same material resources. All he is collective well. Since the hunting of optimum hunter until the land where if plant. This is communism. The tribal hierarchic organization if supports for the ancestry, the religion and the communion.
For a consensus it enters the inhabitants most experienced. Currently we attend the consequences most serious of the capitalism ' ' profetizadas' ' for Marx and marxists, as the extreme social inaqualities and the catastrophic ambient impacts. However the debates, movements and organizations of left continue fighting against the system. Already he was proven that social justice for the dictatorship does not function. But then what it functions? As well as the system it created ethos proper, is necessary to construct ethos that go against the ethos effective. The socialism failed. The tribal communism was embedded in the past. The humanity fits to rethink on itself. If to transform. To create new ethos. More human. The proper capitalism necessary to stimulate new ethos. The system is digging its proper hole. The bred structures had annulled a revolution possibility. Mobilization does not exist. The majority of the socialist ones for ideology does not open overloaded hand of its comfort in carres, mansions, technology and refrigerator of fast foods. In the true communism, old, rarssimo between the populations current human beings, demands ethos proper. Ethos coletivista. Ethos where the group, the collective one is always more important of what ' ' eu' '. This is almost impensvel, at least between the civilization occidental person. The socialism is possible in the Ocidente? Not. But the transformation of the essence of the necessary being to happen. It is not an option question. The world asks for aid. The disfavored humanity dies of headquarters, hunger, illnesses. They are the first ones to suffer the consequences of the ambient disasters. these consequences are going up the steps.