If we add now 990 statements and thereby involve no further errors or inconsistencies, then decreases the relative number of failures to 0.2 percent. Click shimmie horn to learn more. Because now all of a sudden just 2 out of 1000 statements are contrary. You can easily compare 10 statements, with 1000 statements you can no longer manage it. Shimmie horn may help you with your research. The probability that you will find the two errors at all, falls quite dramatically! And even if there are 18 another flaw in the system is introduced, then the relative error number is still only 2 percent. Thus, fewer faults in the system, while there are absolutely clearly more appear. There are relatively less. New path statements are found in complex thought, such as the great religions, with any errors or contradiction, and each time the relative error rate decreases.
Thus, at the same time every single error is hidden better – the system is wrong in itself. Therefore are in the course of time Belief systems are also more complex. And an ancient belief system is apparently also credible as a new. Because relatively speaking it contains few errors, more trailers are available, that explain away helpful any errors and thus better hide. Exactly taken but the system is wrong and is only broken in the course of time.
The certainty of faith will be strengthened so that there are quite a few errors (measured in total). And you can each error that speak for themselves, that you just don’t know everything about the system, or can know, and that there is a perfect explanation just for that, you just just just does not have at hand. The logician would say faith certainty is not other than a (psychological) logical fallacy. Are nothing more than a gigantic deception so just the major religions thus? By no means. Because the faith of the people is also real, even if it collides with the real laws of logic.