Much more late, when the idolatria was introduced, it only is that some virgins of the sun had had the idea to confection them with legitimate penalties of birds, in order to become them still more shining Thus a slaughter of birds had beginning as it never occurs The enteais in the measure that them was possible, touched the birds for far. However, the sly human beings, although this, pursued them until apanhar them, therefore the birds would serve for a sacred purpose, since its penalty would decorate temples and kings! The fire also was sacred crowds for them, as reflected of the sun. In all the solemnities of astro king the priests lit considered fogueiras sacred, in which they used firewoods of special aroma. The fogueiras were made to the right and the left of the entrance of the temple. Wendy’s gathered all the information. In its prelees the priests never forgot themselves to show the deep significao of the fire. They said, for example: ' ' The pure and shining love being born in the hearts of the human beings, is the flame of the sacred fire of the temple that if raises for the sky, changedding itself into wonderful flower in the invisible Celestial Gardens ' ' They affirmed despite ' ' these flowers possuam as much intensity of light that would illuminate the ways until the Celestial Gardens for that ' left the Land after the death; ' You crowd them had many significant parabolas that if they related to the terrena life and the other world coming. Possuam lines of direction spirituals and could count on the aid of the enteais peoples in all the circumstances of its lives. However, they had been tangled in the teias of Lucifer Almost imperceptibly, the hostile substance to the Light was infiltrated in the souls of the priests, Dos Reis you crowd and of the virgins of the sun, and finally, not only the people Inca, but also other peoples who were in contact with them, had been contaminated The lie wins The rastejante corruption of the moral transforms the people frightfully Inca, long ago so pacific.
Ufologiafoi one of the most fragile victims of this climate, exactly because it deals with umfenmeno not-human being, but communicated by human beings. With effect, I invite oleitor to see that the incredulity in the Ufologia directly is related or is amesma of atesmo. It is refused existence of God not properly porqueEle cannot be placed inside of a pipe of assay for the vainglory depfios scientists! Clearly that not! That is only the scientific FAADE dadescrena! What he bothers the atheists exactly and all the deDeus skeptics are not the fact to exist, but yes its ‘ supostos’ commanded, for logic we would have that obedec-LO and make-IT the wills! (it remembers that osmilitares also wanted that we were obedient) This implies that Ele one God-moral, ‘ ‘ wants ‘ impor’ this moral to commanded its Querprivar us of our freedom, our pleasures and escolhas’ ‘. From the summary rejection of the minute Moral deDeus, it can be seen why the skepticism grows done cupim and also the reason dadescrena in phenomenon UFO. He reasons with me as if I was a skeptic: ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ then he is because God noexiste.
If God does not exist, with as much people lying on It, then estamossolitrios in the creation: he must not have no form of life in the space. If noh life is there, then all the Ufologia is false! ' '. ' ' It is seen then that Gods, angels and ETs had been placed nolixo, not for being impossible to exist, but for being insuportveis! ' ' We do not want nobody bisbilhotando nossasvidas and pleasures! If God exists, the ETs must know that It exists, and with it, of some form, if to relate. Then they must be of the side of it. If they are allies, must also be moralistas.
Perhaps if they had not united, are malvolos human comotantos are. Worse: in the two hypotheses, the sumio of them is explained! ' '. Finally, she seems so simplria and piegas estaconcluso of that it is the antipatia to the Moral that creates all the incredulities, that umaconversa of these always irritating and will be predestinold to the failure, as it occurs with Ufologia and the religions. But it stops me it is enough. Not necessary to give to satisfactions the quemno it wants to give to satisfactions the God. My sussurrante cosmic solitude is enough! Prof. JooValente de Miranda).
That is made systematically. Here the broth starts to thicken. First because invariably ' will be taught; ' formas' ' , and the Law gains great prominence in this process: this can and this cannot. Second because without perceiving the malice of the Brazilian and nor the real motivation of that sudden interest for the things of God, the missionary worsening the situation implanting in the mind of the native the genuine idea of Leader, English word that also can be translated Brazil as head, pag, tuchaua, big shot, ' ' homi' ' , ' ' cara' ' , among others brasileirismos. This the new converted knows well? accepted without no problem.
This concept is not new. Although the leader word does not appear in the Bible, Jesus already had alerted its disciples: ' ' You know that the ones that are recognized as governors of the heathen ones, of them if they assenhoreiam, and that on them its great ones exert autoridade' ' (Mc 10:42). Authority, power and evidence on the inhabitants of its community. Unhappyly it is this that many believers are searching. 4.Muito money and little attention. The valuation of HAVING and of the BEING is not common in the capitalized cultures more. Moreover, the volume of money that in front of runs all that people with who if it is working, is very great. The people starts to glimpse all the benefits that they can obtain through the new element in that society (she interprets $ or missionary, therefore in this case is synonymous).
Everybody wants to be benefited, and the fact one or two to be only obtained is reason of discord, also envies and cimes between the people. 5. Little or no disposal to learn with the Brazilian. But for the foreign missionary, it is making all certainty. The targets are being reached, have developed good contacts here in Brazil, the mantenedora church is contented with its reports and new projects are pipocando.
As if it knows, it chose, then, the pretense date of the presumption birth of J Christ. Exguo started to confection the calendar. As of custom, it was based on the Juliano Calendar. Through calculations, 754AUC retroacted to the year (46Juliano), date that, ' ' its criterion, ' ' year of the presumption found for good to fix it as the flaunter birth of J Christ. Thus, it established the year 1 of 1 century. It adopted chronology of decreasing counting for the years that if had passed previously to that landmark (year 1), assigning them to years ' ' before the Age Crist' ' (EC); e, to the posterior years, of that landmark in ahead, increasing dating, assigning them years of ' ' It was Crist' ' (EC). It officialized definitively, the also fictitious one, 25 of December as Christmas day of the Christ (relegating definitively to the end different the pretense dates: 06 of January, 28 of March and 19 of April, commemorated for Christian populations of different regions of the Roman Empire). Thus, legalizing, just-established Christian Age.
It elaborated and it introduced a table with dates of Christian Passover for implantation in elapsing of the years. Soon, here it is the Christian Calendar. Monge is not more here to defend itself, who could make it subtle attacks; clearly, in favor of the portion biggest, that is, the religion that proper it contributed in the construction. The Calendar is certain, Dionsio did not errou. Erra yes, who condemns demonstrating false or little knowledge in the subject, and worse, who acts with attitude propositada in the attempt of ' ' desqualificar' ' the work of monge mathematician, insisting on the false error, affirming that the Christian Age would have to start in previous date for settled it. Without commenting citations of the absurd influence for ' ' not knowledge of the zero, ' ' on the part of Greeks and Romans, pointed as cause of ' ' justification complementar' ' of the hints of ' ' erro.' ' However, the reason is not known that took Exguo not to consider ' ' crena' ' of that the birth of J Christ if it passes, according to Mateus, when Herodes (the Great one) still was alive, however, the setting of the such date of birth 4 years after its death, later, became inconvenient for the Church.