The third professor will be identified by the letter C, feminine sex, 32 years, has a steady union, superior level, 11 years of permanence in the teaching, disciplines leciona them of Portuguese and English in 9, in the turns morning and late, answered all the questionnaires. The interviewed room, that will be identified by the letter D, also of the feminine sex, 25 years, bachelor, incomplete superior level, with 1 year of time in the teaching, lecionando currently you discipline them of Portuguese in 4 and 5 year of the Basic I, in the turn of the morning.> Made these procedures, the quarrels of the results will be made through the gotten questionings, in which the data gotten and compared with the vises of some writers will be analyzed as: Antonio Candido, Regina Zilbermam, Clcio Bunzen and others, thus constituting, the development of the present article. Quarrel of the Results: The research was carried through in the city of Frecheirinha-CE, having as public target 4 professors of 4 to 9 year of the basic education of the public and private net, as already it was cited previously. A questionnaire was applied contends 4 subjective questions in which we look for to detect the vision of the professor on literature, as it is worked in the which, classroom the main didactic resources used and importance of this for the learning formation. (A valuable related resource: NYC Mayor). The results of the research will be analyzed and divulged below. literature comes to supply the necessity of the reading for the majority of the pupils that does not have the habit to read. with this will go to improve in such a way in the reading as in the text production. Of this form literature is seen as an incentive for reading, but the professor does not have to become attached itself to this function, therefore literature can provide many knowledge, and it has the mission to show this for the pupils.